How Federal Tort Claims Act Exempts Sure Healthcare Suppliers From Knowledge Breach, Class Motion | JD Supra


Knowledge breach class motion lawsuits stay central to the continuing battle to safe compensation and redress for authorized victims of cyber safety breaches sued by knowledge homeowners. In these instances, the underlying situations embrace prison hacking episodes, rogue workers, negligence, and surprising materials deficiencies in cybersecurity and patch administration. Nevertheless, a one-size-fits-all strategy to typical class actions typically locations well being care suppliers on the mercy of the plaintiff’s class motion, and courts could also be reluctant to dismiss or appropriately restrict these instances at an early stage. Nonetheless, hope could also be on the horizon. For instance, in a brand new wave of instances, sure federally funded group well being facilities have used the Federal Tort Claims Act as a method of substituting the US as the right defendant in knowledge breach instances.

Congress and the Division of Well being & Human Companies have lengthy been conscious that the federal sector and federally affiliated suppliers shouldn’t have limitless assets. Extra particularly, burdening such suppliers with personal hospital litigation and protection prices solely depletes the federal treasury (instantly or not directly) and diverts federal funds from affected person care to such exterior actors. the litigation ecosystem (particularly plaintiff legal professionals and regulation corporations). After the B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State Constructing in 1946, the FTCA was put in place as a mechanism to strike a steadiness between offering enough authorized cures to injured events and making certain that the federal sector and federally-affiliated service suppliers don’t obtain the funding they want. present care.

Whereas these provisions of the FTCA originated in medical malpractice and different sometimes non-class motion situations, they’re equally, if no more, necessary when a service supplier faces a category motion for a widespread knowledge breach or an information breach that allegedly induced private harm. to the category consultant and putative class members.

Knowledge breaches within the healthcare sector have elevated through the years and proceed to develop. A current examine by the Identification Theft Useful resource Middle discovered that there have been 1,862 recognized knowledge breaches in 2021, exposing roughly 300 million delicate data.1 Of the 1,862 registered knowledge breaches, 330 or 17.7% involved the pharmaceutical business and led to the publicity of roughly 30 million delicate data.

The FTCA waives sovereign immunity and locations the U.S. authorities on equal footing with personal sector defendants sued for sure varieties of torts. As well as, the FTCA imposes legal responsibility on the US for claims in opposition to federal entities ensuing from “harm or lack of property or private harm or dying.” 28 USC § 2679(b)(1). Beneath the phrases of the FTCA, this legal responsibility is the unique treatment for such claims. The Federally Supported Well being Facilities Aid Act expanded this unique treatment to workers of public well being companies sued for “private accidents, together with dying, arising out of the efficiency of medical, surgical, dental, or associated capabilities.” 42 USC § 233(a). Thus, “Part 233(a) grants PHS officers and workers absolute immunity from motion arising out of medical or associated duties carried out in the middle of their employment by barring any motion in opposition to them for such conduct.” Hui v. Castaneda, 559 US 799, 806 (2010). Key elements to think about in knowledge breaches involving well being care suppliers are (1) whether or not the well being care supplier was “considered” an worker of PHS and (2) whether or not the alleged knowledge breach resulted from the efficiency of medical or associated actions inside the well being care supplier’s scope of apply.

1. PHS workers

Pursuant to 42 USC § 233(g), sure eligible group well being facilities could also be thought-about workers of PHS. A group well being heart is outlined as “an entity serving a medically underserved inhabitants or a selected medically underserved inhabitants consisting of migrant and seasonal staff, the homeless, and public housing residents.” 42 USC § 254b. Different PHS staff could embrace well being facilities for migrants, well being facilities for the homeless, and first well being facilities in public housing.2

2. Performing medical or associated actions

In current knowledge breach instances involving group well being facilities, defendants have argued that sustaining the confidentiality of affected person data is a medical or associated responsibility as a result of the regulation governing PHS standing requires the well being heart to have a “steady high quality enchancment system that features medical companies and administration and maintains affected person data of confidentiality.” 42 USC § 254b(okay)(3)(C) (emphasis added). The chief orders additionally require well being facilities to keep up “acceptable safeguards to make sure the confidentiality of affected person data.” 42 CFR § 51c.110. The applying, which well being facilities should full with a purpose to receive PHS standing, requires the middle to certify that it “has applied programs and procedures to guard the confidentiality of affected person data and to guard that data from loss, destruction[] or unauthorized use in accordance with federal and state necessities.”3

Equally, if the well being care entity has been held to be an worker of PHS and the info breach occurred within the efficiency of medical or associated duties, there’s statutory and case regulation assist for the well being care entity to be entitled to immunity below the FTCA. In 2022, three federal courts ordered the US to exchange group well being facilities primarily based on this analytical strategy.4 We anticipate these points to proceed to develop on the district and appellate courtroom ranges in 2023.


  1. Establish and replace your Federally Certified Well being Middle standing or different eligible standing, if out there and relevant.
  2. Embody your FQHC standing and related FTCA protection in your total danger administration and insurance coverage buy.
  3. Establish probably coated claims or threats of claims and, if crucial, rapidly notify HHS when FTCA protection is in impact.

1 See 2021 Knowledge Breach Annual Report (ITRC, January 2022), p. 6, out there at (Final visited November 30, 2022).
2 (Final visited November 30, 2022).
3 See Program Help Letter 2021-21, Calendar 12 months 2022 Necessities for Federal Tort Claims Act Protection for Well being Facilities and Their Coated Individuals (Feb. 9, 2021), at 4 p.m., out there at (Final visited November 30, 2022).
4 Ford v. Sandhills Med. Discovered., Inc., Case No. 4:21-CV-02307-RBH, US District Courtroom for the District of South Carolina (Nov. 10, 2022), attraction pending, No. 22-2268 (4th Cir.); Mixon v. CareSouth Carolina, Inc., Case No. 4:22-CV-00269-RBH, US District Courtroom for the District of South Carolina (June 2, 2022); Jane Doe v. Neighborhood Healthcare et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-01587-BEN-RBB, US District Courtroom for the Southern District of California (September 8, 2022).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *